|
The potential energy of the twist boat conformation lies between that of the chair and the half-chair.
View along the C-C bonds, and do some angle measurements.
|
What is the reason for the lower energy-content of the twist-boat compared to
that of the half-chair? Or, in other words: why is the twist-boat a more stable
conformation than the half-chair?
In the twist-boat conformation,
What is the main reason for the higher energy-content of the twist-boat compared to that of the chair? Or, in other words: why is the twist-boat a less stable conformation than the chair?
In the twist-boat conformation,
So far we didn't meet the boat conformation yet. It doesn't appear in the interconversion
process that we animated.
Like the half-chair, it is an energy maximum: it is a low lying transition state
(much lower than the half-chair!)
between two twist-boat structures.
|
Note the very low energy barrier.
So in fact all the possible chairs, and all twist-boat minima, are connected via these
pathways.
Don't get the idea that one chair always moves straight to the 'other' chair:
a twist-boat intermediate can move 'sideways' to another twist-boat, and
another one, and from there
select any other route. The result is a continuously 'wobbling' cyclohexane ring.
A point to philosophize:
Talking about symmetry: what is the symmetry of the boat conformation?
If we distinguish between all the atoms (e.g. number them), how many
different boat structures can we draw? How many different chairs? How
many different twist-boats?
So far for cyclohexane itself. What happens if we introduce
substituents?
