Electrophilic aromatic substitution is a two step process with a positively charged intermediate. The transition state of the first, rate determining step resembles this intermediate. So we want to test the hypothesis that substituents which stabilise the positive charge increase the rate of the reaction. This stabilisation depends on the position of the substituent with respect to the positive charge, which is the cause of the directive effect these substituents have.
In the first part of this exercise one can introduce substituents in two compounds that act as a model for the transition state.
Both are structures with a positive charge that is stabilized or destabilized by substituents at the various positions. In this way one can compare the effects a substituent has in either the meta or the para position. (The ortho position is often not included in these studies because it introduces a new steric effect on top of the electronic effect we want to measure.)
|
|
Another approach is the computational simulation of the first step of the substitution reaction. This gives for each position the value of the calculated activation energy. Using this figures not only the meta and para positions can be compared, but also the difference with the unsubstituted compound. In other words: whether the substituent is activating (causes a lower activation energy) or deactivating with respect to benzene.
It is more difficult to see why or how a substituent
stabilizes
the positive charge in the benzenonium intermediate or the benzyl cation.
Normally in calculations (of alkanes) C-H bonds are
polarized, with charges like C -0.22, H +0.22.
In the benzenonium ion the
ortho C's have a charge of more or less zero, the para is 0.14, indicating the
donation of charge. So they become less negative, more positive.
Another method of comparison is by adding the hydrogen charge to the charge of the carbon it is connected to.
This information can be read from the output files, the mopac.arc or mopac.out
files that are listed on the display page after a calculation.
Carbon charges in benzenonium ion: C -0.2328 protonated C C 0.0491 ortho to C1, more positive C -0.2115 meta, no effect C 0.1399 para, more positive C -0.23 meta C 0.0469 ortho, more positive
|
In Chime, one can display a surface coloured by electrostatic potential. However, the information listed above hardly shows up in the electrostatic potential map, because Chime detects that the whole species is positive, and makes the whole structure dark blue. 'Minor' differences between -0.2 and +0.2 become invisible. When using the so-called Rasmol colouring scheme (lower model), at least the difference between meta and ortho/para positions can be seen. You can click on the mopac.arc files, after a calculation, in order to read the charges calculated for a structure. Check this for meta-OH and para-OH (carbons and oxygen!). |
![]() |
|
Can you think of another way to check for the difference between ortho/para and meta positions in the stabilization of charge, by e.g. chlorine? (hint: any geometrical aspects?)